Chinese car to harm the country in the name of patriotism harm the country
automobile joint venture equity ratio around the question whether the release,
louis vuitton outlet, Minister of Industry and Miao Wei made their stand clear, 'or re-protection period', after the automobile joint venture shares to the steel, chemical and other industries than the release. But this 'period of time' in the end is the one, two, or, Miao Minister eight years did not clear. As to why the car should be placed after the steel, chemical and other industries,
brownsburgchatham.ca/NewFile.html, what scientific evidence do?, Or simply because the automotive industry is more important? Or is the state-owned auto companies opposed to sound more intense? Seedlings minister also did not elaborate this is extremely vague and prone misguided policy signals, make all industry players and consumer confusion but we have to ask is, which for the Chinese automotive industry,
Louis Vuitton Canada Outlet 78% Off Louis Vuitton Bags Online, for the rights and interests of Chinese consumers to achieve the country, in the end is a blessing or a curse?
if not competitive enough as a reason for reform, not open, and that China had opened earlier in the automotive industry may not be open. Because light industry,
wentworth.ca/useager.asp?, household appliances, machinery, information, daily chemical, food, beverage, beer, commercial, trade, logistics and other industries in the fully open competitiveness of domestic enterprises is extremely low, and it seems far less technology, capital, products, brands management, channel and so completely not a grade competition multinationals, and even a lot of people assert these industries will die after the release of the national economy. Those capital and technology-intensive industries such as digital program-controlled switches, some expert judgment is to be open will cause multinational monopolies, corporate development suffocation nation, they have been strongly urged not open or restricted opening. However, practice has proved that it is the opening of these sectors, it bred a truly international competitiveness of domestic enterprises. Domestic enterprises not only in the domestic market due to re-occupy the position,
louis vuitton outlet online, also gaining a greater share of the international market, China has become the world's largest exporter,
louis vuitton sale, exporting more than two trillion U.S. dollars, is it not through market liberalization and enhanced competition to achieve it?
industry's importance as a reason if not open, slowly open the so-called people's livelihood is not the monopoly of the industry can never open? we have already seen, do not open industry (even those 'semi-open' industry) forever it will not form a real competitive edge, then is not it only continue to not open or restrict open? exclusive monopoly interests in a closed market, of course, also make certain departments, groups benefit, but the national interests and the interests of consumers placed where? market liberalization and foster their competitiveness logical relationships in the end is what? through open competition to improve competitiveness, or through closed monopoly to improve competitiveness?
not help think of the past, an important node in the reform and opening up each of these issues have all been widely discussed. As previously Deng Xiaoping's southern tour, before joining the WTO, the idea of reform and opening up have problems, and for some industries, including specific open questions automotive, electronics, information, chemicals, food, beverage and other industries, producing too strongly questioned and even denied. Deng Xiaoping's southern tour speech, widely publicized when joining the WTO, are not fundamentally solve the problem, which is the cause of reform and opening up in recent years,
http://bbs.orchisky.com/showtopic-121191.aspx, we have stagnated or even ideological and theoretical understanding of the root causes of regressive Unfortunately, the reform and opening up 30 years later Today, in a comprehensive reform and opening today, the market in the allocation of resources clearly play a decisive role today, to build an open economy in the new system today, we actually still for such basic concepts and facts tangled logic, fuzzy and even errors a new round of comprehensive deepening of reform how we can successfully advance?
open competition has been a priority of China's automotive development,
http://www.wan669.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=1754200, we must re lessons learned 60 years of development of the automotive industry, reflect what has so far failed to establish their own international competitiveness, not even in the face of multinational competition in the domestic market? in Based on this, in order to re-enact our vehicle development strategy, legal and policy system reconstruction automobile industry trade control measures in direct violation of WTO rules,
http://www.mexster.com/elgg/blog/view/11501/louis-vuitton-canvas-cell, but also harm the interests of consumers. While we are committed to joining the WTO canceled when the number of cars imported to control, and gradually reduce tariff barriers, but have to say, we did not completely done in the implementation process. For example, automobile import registration issues, is not a disguised form of approval and the number of control? Actually, no matter how we emphasize China's auto market has fully complied with the commitments and rules of open markets at home and abroad to see the difference very clearly become China should let private capital leading force in the development of the local automotive. From the nature of the properties and characteristics of the automotive industry in terms of production, investment and state-owned enterprise model is not suitable to engage in automobile production, the world's major automobile manufacturers are not state-owned enterprises is no accident (developed market economies in certain areas where there are state-owned enterprises). Japan, South Korea, they are able to develop its automobile private property is one of the decisive factors, but unfortunately our industry experts, officials repeatedly talked to learn Japanese, Korean Shique intentionally or unintentionally ignored this most important point is the Chinese private capital I hope the car in the future, state-owned investment should gradually withdraw from the automotive sector. Geely, like other businesses, and it was blocked in the investment approval outside the automotive industry, 1997 'route' involved in the automotive industry, 2001 was on a directory, be had official status. 2010 for the acquisition of the world-famous car brand Volvo. Can now harder to assert ultimate success, but at least the state-owned Geely has taken a solid step car prices has not. If we are at the beginning of reform and opening up to allow private capital to enter the automotive sector, is not among them will appear Haier, Huawei such enterprises or the unknown, but now much stronger than it!
After
liberalized market, China's domestic auto will face extinction, such alarmist conclusions, it can not release the equity ratio commentators desired effect, but also the pessimistic predictions of some people in other industries before opening. Lack of competition in their own self-confidence, to think that Chinese enterprises are lack of such confidence. But quite interesting is that the current strength is far behind the private-owned car prices,
http://www.jf-ltd.com/index.php/member/374943/, car prices, but not afraid of multinational competition, advocates liberalization of market access, so that the public funding and state-owned, foreign officials in charge of equal competition cars really should carefully study the reform and opening years of practice, look at those open industry is collapsed or better? market that monopoly industries, the industry has long been the exclusive closed state-owned enterprises, whether to cultivate their competitive edge? must truly national interests, national interests and the interests of consumers ultimately be judged according to the return, rather than government power, the original business interests as a standard to determine the overall policy direction to deepen reform,
http://www.dvi-labs.info/wiki/?title=User:Tfzqqzl051&action=submit, not a verbal talking about it, when one of the specific operation on requirements 'reform exception'; promote reform, nor is generalities bold aesthetic, one to the specific measures for specific industries hesitations, dread retreat.