During the filing process, McGillis continued to correspond with Uber and its attorney Jordan Cohen. The company offered the former driver a $5,http://www.producteursdemaregion.com/vars.php?capital-one-cup/liput/,000 settlement, according to emails McGillis provided to BuzzFeed News. McGillis countered,http://www.kombatkungfu.it/postinfo.asp?euro-2012/grecia.html, requesting $8,000. Uber did not respond.
McGillis forged ahead with his complaint against Uber. In it, he claimed he should be classified as an employee,http://ginasbloomingfantasies.com/sidebar.php?spanien/real-betis/, not a contractor. Uber “directs how,http://www.akkanatayakkabi.com/wp-searches.php?produkter/manchester-united-drakt-og-supporterutstyr/, where,http://backchecktech.com/wp-diff.php?southampton-billetter/, and when drivers work,http://www.agrolangeland.dk/rex_v.php?fodboldtroslashjer-klubhold-atletico-madrid-troslashje-bedste-332_335_343.html,” McGillis argued in the complaint, a copy of which was provided to BuzzFeed News. “Uber drivers are employees,http://www.tilmanngrawe.com/wp-content.php?la-pena/medlemsservice, they are required to follow a litany of detailed requirements imposed on them by Uber and they are graded,http://www.gpf.it/ita_risorse.asp?6937_Maglia_Pantaloncini_Kit_Home_Divisa_Real_Madrid_Diego_Lopez_25_Portiere_2014_15, and are subject to termination, based on their failure to adhere to these requirements.”
That’s an argument that has some teeth thanks to the IRS definition of independent contractor: “The general rule is that an individual is an independent contractor if the payer has the right to control or direct only the result of the work and not what will be done and how it will be done.”
The Florida Department of Economic Opportunity’s decision,http://www.katalogportali.com/wp-searches.php?seleccion-de-futbol-australiano-c-612_616.html, though it only applies to McGillis, comes during a nationwide debate over whether Uber drivers should be classified as employees. Early this year,http://nuvomedia.dk/wp-plugins.php?italien/bologna/, Uber was several class action suits alleging it wrongly classifies its drivers as contractors. One of those suits, O’Connor v. Uber, will be heard in front of a jury. In his decision to deny Uber’s motion for summary judgment in that case,http://purplefrogshopping.com/wp-searches.php?MAILLOT-INTER-MILAN-20142015-cbaaaacWa.asp, Judge Edward Chen wrote: “The more relevant inquiry is how much control Uber has over its drivers while they are on duty for Uber. The fact that some drivers are only on-duty irregularly says little about the level of control Uber can exercise over them when they do report to work.”
And as BuzzFeed News ,http://www.aaskov-mini.dk/phpinfo.php?Fodboldtr%25C3%25B8jer-B%25C3%25B8rn%3Flimit%3D50, training classes that Uber offers deactivated drivers also raise questions about the company’s classification of its drivers.
In its order, the DEO provided no rationale for its decision on McGillis’ claim. It simply said it followed an agency investigation. Uber now has 20 days to appeal.相关的主题文章：


http://93zb.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=468531&fromuid=69289

http://www.dailyqr.com/blog_entry.php?user=1463558&blogentry_id=30593194

http://www.autopaint.cn/?viewnews-5802.html

http://www.lingxiankaoyan.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3335171&fromuid=306460

http://www.hzzlyx.net/guestbook.asp