Some of the audience gave a standing ovation at the end of the film. But many critics seemed unconvinced by Noe's 'blood, sperm and tears' vision

One film-goer told MailOnline that the movie was more restrained than she was expecting it to be
The story follows a young American man in Paris, Murphy, looking back on his lost love, Electra, and their time together.
Noe puts himself at the centre of the story - the lead character is a budding filmmaker who talks about wanting to make an explicit film about love and sex. Two of the side characters in the film are even called Gaspar and Noe, the latter played by the director himself, wearing a wig.
3D has been used for hardcore pornography before, but this is thought to be the first time it has been used for sex scenes in an arthouse film.
'I felt that 3D would allow the viewer a greater sense of identification with the lead character and his nostalgic state,' Noe said.
Noe is no stranger to controversy. In 2002, a screening of his film 'Irreversible' at Cannes led to several ambulances being called for audience members who could not cope with its in-your-face rape scene.
With his latest movie, the director said in the statement much of the credit went to his cast.
'More than in my previous films I owe the result to the daring and trust of the actors... who joyfully agreed to play the three main roles,' he said.
Cannes festival director Thierry Fremaux introduced the screening and the three unknown stars by saying the audience 'will know them very, very well in two hours'.
However, one film-goer told MailOnline that the movie was more restrained than she was expecting it to be.
She said: 'It was very conservative to be honest. Lot of penis shots, but no vagina close-ups. Particularly for this filmmaker, who is known for pushing the envelope, it was pretty tame stuff and also deeply heteronormative. I was expecting it to be more experimental and kinky. Bit of a let down.'

Swiss actress Aomi Muyock, US actor Karl Glusman, Argentine director Gaspar Noe and Danish actress Klara Kristin pose during the photocall for Love at Cannes

Actress Klara Kristin poses during the photocall for Love
And it got a largely negative response from critics on Twitter.
'Just Gaspar Noe badly sketching a souring relationship. And the sex scenes get boring after a while,' wrote Isabel Stevens, of Sight and Sound magazine, on Twitter.
BBC film critic Jason Solomons said it 'was definitely not a porn film - the dialogue's not up to that level'.
Variety gave a more nuanced critique, saying 'you've gotta hand it to Noe for leaving no taboo unturned, and for putting so much of himself into a film that's bound to leave titillation seekers resenting its creator during the long stretches of wallowing introspection between climaxes.'
Fremaux jumped to Noe's defence at a press conference, saying 'the last thing to do at Cannes is read the critics'.
'Gaspar Noe has made a film that some love and some hate. Literature and painting visit the question of the representation of the body, of sex, of physical love, but very few filmmakers have done so in 120 years of the history of cinema,' said Fremaux.相关的主题文章：


http://www.robynramirez.com/Photos/picture.php?/25/list/12,11,17,3,18,23,25,27,1,5,7,9,19,15,10&comments_order=DESC#comments

http://vote.qdxiaoluohao.com/dzx/home.php?mod=space&uid=3891287&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=16534119

http://youqinghui888.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1034325

http://www.ix.sakura.ne.jp/~art/spirit/meibo/mezase.cgi

http://www.flightsim.com