Whether police need to wear body cameras is really no longer in question; it s a given at this point. The upside is so high it s simply stupid not to use them. The focus should now move on to how this process is carried out. The first question should be who controls the recorded information? Currently it seems almost everyone thinks we should just automatically default to the police maintaining the database. But how is that not a fox watching the hen house? The video will be used to assess everyone s behavior,arsenal fc cycling jersey, including the police,green bay packers elite jerseys, to be sure the truth is known as best we can. It would make no more sense to let the public control the information than the police. The state Legislature needs to come up with a new idea here that addresses this issue in connection to our modern times and technologies. Having judges be in charge of maintaining and reviewing the information would make way more sense than having the police. The second question is,man city kit 13 14 pes 2013, who should have access to the information? Specifically,peyton manning denver broncos jerseys nike, are the data public record that must conform to all disclosure laws? I say no. All police interaction with citizens is an intrusion into their privacy to some degree and is almost never done with a warrant,buy liverpool shirt south africa, just probable cause. Probable cause should not rise to the level of public record. Only allow officers and citizens who are in the videos a public opportunity to review them.Steve Shanewise Olympia相关的主题文章：


http://top100.zhongsou.net/developer/index.php/%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7:Rvvpkhoyr#womens_chelsea_away_shirt_The_Houston_Rockets_present_how_no

http://www1.imun.edu.cn/nongxue/E_GuestBook.asp

http://www.jp-net.ne.jp/zakkabbs/joyful.cgi

http://www.gzbjyg.cn/Gzbjyg_GuestBook.Asp

http://kiyop.com/cgi/kiyop_bs/yybbs.cgi