Freeman-Quay denies the allegation that he delivered the blow.
The case centres largely on CCTV footage captured of the incident,jual jersey barcelona 3rd, and whether it shows Freeman-Quay as the man who punched Mr Pridham.
The accused,peyton manning jerseys for boys, represented by barrister Ken Archer,new man united away jersey 2014, argues the footage is ambiguous and unclear,liverpool goalkeeper third kit 2013 14, and that he was not the one who delivered the offending blow.
A biomechanics expert analysed the footage and arrived at the conclusion that Freeman-Quay was responsible for the punch that caused the injury.
But Mr Archer has objected to his evidence being tendered before Chief Justice Helen Murrell,customized chelsea jersey india, and much of Monday was spent arguing about its admissibility.
The judge-alone trial continues before the ACT Supreme Court on Tuesday,Men's Nike San Francisco 49ers 15 Michael Crabtree Limited Red Team Color Super Bowl XLVII NFL Jersey, when the admissibility issue is likely to be resolved.相关的主题文章：


http://www.nii.ac.jp/nels/man/descript/item_list.html

http://115.29.6.116/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1067346&fromuid=59059

http://bbs.wabaka.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3980902&fromuid=595685

http://www.bizhall.com.cn/?action-viewcomment-itemid-1746

http://www.weiliu.tv/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4583988&fromuid=584680